fuck it seems i cant even knock them off the end by filling it up

t5
4t54
t34
t4
3t
43t
3
t
34t
3t
4
t
45t
45y

57ui
78i
768o
89
l89
;
90;
09
0;
90
;
9;
9;
9
;
9
;9
;
9;
9
;
;'
i0
'i0
'0
'
0
'0
';
9;
9l;
8
l
89l
89
9k
89k
7
kj6
j
5
h4r
g
4
g
34g
4
5
g
4g
5g
45
g

4
g
4g

h
t
j
67
i
8
yku/
k'u
k'7
uk'
'k
yu'
k'yu
'k
uy'
i'
yu'k
'y
k'u
k

ki
k
iu
l
iu
l

ui
l
uil
iu

ltu
kl
yil
uoip;l9
;9-

olk

hg
4e
4rwst
hjyt

tretyu
u
tr

h
g
rtd
ty

et
y

er
yg
hrth
u
nj
tn
t
n
ty
n
t
n
t

n
yu
nk
tyum
kui
m,

u
m,
ui
lm
iu
l
ui
l
uio;
ui
;
iop
'
;[0

'
=0
'
0'

0
-
';
9
,m
y
vg
rc
w
cf
we
xe
w
xdew
c
fwr
fc
reg
cvt
gv
ht
v
trh
vrt
v
tr
hv
th
v
tr
v
ty
j
yum
ol
i8ul
io
u;
op
;
iop
'
op
'
[p
o=

[-0
[
-09
89
i7
y
5

tv

cr
x
rc

4
rc
4w
cv

v
v
t
vt
5e4vy
e5b
ye
b
y

5b
yb

65b

6n

r6
nr5
u
rm
r
m
um
u
m
,r
,
r7,
i7
,i7
i
.


7
,
du
u
nrd
5y
evt
4wc
3w
cr3
c
3q
c
3
c
r3c
t

v
y
bn
56
bnu
67n
i76
im
i8
,
8
,87m
m
mi7

t
7
u

r5
b5

v

v
4
v

v4
r4
w3v
w34v
w43v
34w
v
54t
v
54
v

vt54e
vt
v
w
c3

wz

dx
axw

a
ex
r
v
yb
n
il
p;



l-

[
0l
[[-0
9
k
9p
k
mn

i
m

m
o
m8
o
mo
m
y9
m
i
iiiiiiiiii





i
mo
7o
79
m
798
mo
98,
p890
.,[
-0.
'=-0
.'
=-.
'=-
.'-
.'
-.'
-
.'-
.'
-[.
;0,9
l
miou
n
byt
rc
fvgb
hnjmk
jnhb
vcf
gbhn
jhb
gvf
c
vg
bh
nb
gfc
v
b
h
n
b
g
v

bh
nj

hbg
fg
h
nj
h
bh
vg

bh
n

bhv

vg
b
n

vg
b
h
h

f
fwe
f
wfw
f
wef
wf
awg
rt
h
rythj
ytj
ty
j
tyj
ytj
trh
e
tgerw
t
wtr
qwr
we
rw
t
werg
re
h
th
t
nr
tn
tn
r
be
ag
wrewhg
er
jtk
yk
yu
ki
lui
kliyu
kyi
l
yikl
yuk
ykj
tgj
h
grs
fg
we
rf
wetr435t
54
yt54
6
45
y6
y
56
u
7i
78
o89
op
890p
90
p
90
p90
[
-0
[
0-[
9p
9y7
i7
6u
set
w
d
qw
d
wq
s
qw
a

q
22
3
2
e
er
3wr
w4
t
ey
4
y
5
u
t
6
j
6
k
y
k
y
k7

k
y
k


l
uoi
l
io;
l9
;
i;f

gfx
gb
gf
g


cv
b d
b
db
i
;
op;
op
o
';
op
';/.
l,hm
gnbv

c
v
c
b

yesf

can i delete favourites if i dont like them anymore and stuff, what about this wank column of shite? blah blah. there is so much shite around.

mm

Howdy, check my journal for an offer that you CANNOT refuse!

Is photography easy?....

I see so many generic, glossy, high contrast, high saturation pictures of sunsets and pretty reflections in water, and wonder if this counts as photography. Out of all the items I have posted in my gallery, the most popular in terms of views and favourites etc are photographs. All images in my gallery are pictures taken with my mobile phone, any lighting was assembled with next to no effort, and the pictures taken as parts of series, such that something half decent was likely to come out.

The effort involved however to do even a simple drawing is so much more conscious and must feed from many hours of drawing experience. I fully understand and appreciate good photography, dont get me wrong. A good photographer will have an amazing eye for composition, and the technical aspect of photography is a vast subject... but with a million kids picking up digital cameras, and snapping away at the usual cliches...i just dont know.

Maybe its a good thing that photography is so accessable. Maybe drawing talent is underrated. Or maybe I am accidentally a great photographer, I doubt that very much.

It seems that it is wholly possible for anyone to pick up a camera, point it at something beautiful, and stumble into a great photograph straight away. Could the same person who has never drawn pick up a pencil and do a great drawing, or a paintbrush and do a great painting? I think this means that photography is basically just a very personal art, and that due to the freedom to choose relatively accurately, and with relative ease, what image you want to create/capture, photographs should not be rated as good or bad too quickly. I would argue that art in the traditional sence however, even if still only created as personal expression, can be judged as to its technical value from the outset.

If I am trying to get anything across, I think its really a question or two... Is photography easy? Does anyone really know whats 'good photgraphy'?

I am still thinking about this, it is probably just a reaction against the speed of the photographer to create their artwork... So it is apparent that what makes a good photographer is the eye they have for seeing what would create an aesthetically pleasing/meaningfull/thought provoking etc image. Is this true? Must a traditional artist not do the same, but then have to reinterpret it all again for themselves? If it is not technical ability that matters, and such arts are purely personal mediums, then what's left?

Any thoughts are appreciated. I don't really know yet.

Is photography too easy, is it easier than drawing? Is it a pointless to compare arts?

hm hm hmmm.

[I do see lots of interesting and inspiring photography, and no offence to sunset/puddle fanatics]

welcome to DA

--
a person is measured not by what they have gained or lossed. but by the way they have choosen to live the life they have been given.

Thanks for the Fav!
good luck w/ your film!

--
"art is complete; not when there is more to add, but when there is nothing more to take away"
:Some art guy